SWOLY vs. EcoWise Wellness (2026): Which Creatine Gummy Actually Delivers?

SWOLY and EcoWise Wellness sell the same product: a creatine monohydrate gummy for people who will not mix powder. Same category, same format, same buyer, same promise. That makes them direct substitutes, and it makes the central question simple: which one actually puts creatine in the gummy, and what does the rest of the purchase cost you?

This is desk research, not hands-on testing. No gummy was purchased for this page, none was eaten, and no lab work was commissioned. What follows compares live product pages, published policies, public review records and independent lab evidence, all checked on November 2, 2026. Where a number moves, it is dated. Where a claim could not be verified, the page says so.

Our reviews score SWOLY at 3.8 out of 5 and EcoWise Wellness at 2.0. The gap is not taste. SWOLY is a real US supplement company selling a plausible 4 g creatine gummy. EcoWise’s flagship 5 g gummy failed independent potency testing twice, and nothing published since has answered the result. One of these is a creatine supplement with a convenience premium. The other is a creatine supplement in name only until proven otherwise.

The count is 7-2. EcoWise’s two wins are narrow: more flavors and 0 g of sugar on the label, plus free autoship shipping for US subscribers. They do not change the answer to the only question that matters for a creatine purchase.

One caveat applies to both. Neither publishes a COA you can download, and neither names its testing lab. SWOLY’s testing claim is unverified; EcoWise’s is unverified and contradicted by the one independent test on record. If a published COA is a hard requirement, neither gummy qualifies, and a third-party-tested creatine powder is the better purchase.

Price per Serving and Cost per Verified Gram

Both brands publish a per-serving number and sell the same active ingredient. The difference is what the serving contains.

	SWOLY	EcoWise Wellness
One-time price	$32.98 for 30 servings	$69 displayed on the product page; $90 in the one-pack variant data
Subscription price	$27.95 per 30-day delivery	$45 per 30-day delivery
Servings per container	30 (5 gummies per serving)	30 (4 gummies per serving)
Creatine claimed per serving	4 g	5 g
Cost per serving, one-time	$1.10	$2.30 at the $69 display; $3.00 at $90
Cost per serving, subscription	$0.93	$1.50
Cost per gram of labeled creatine, subscription	about $0.23	about $0.30
Independent creatine result	3,957 mg per serving reported by a reviewer, lab unnamed and report unpublished	zero detectable creatine in two lots, SuppCo, June 2025
Cost per gram of verified creatine	about $0.24 if the reported result is accepted	not calculable

SWOLY’s math is straightforward. A 30-serving container is $32.98 one-time, or $27.95 on the 30-day subscription. That is $1.10 or $0.93 per serving, and each serving is five gummies carrying 4 g of creatine monohydrate. On the subscription price, you are paying about 23 cents per gram of labeled creatine. If you accept the 3,957 mg result SWOLY reportedly shared with ActiveGearReview in April 2025, the cost per gram of actual creatine is about 24 cents. The lab was unnamed and the report unpublished, so that figure is reported rather than verified, but it is close to the label.

EcoWise’s math is more expensive and less certain. The 30-day subscription is $45, which is $1.50 per serving and about 30 cents per gram of the 5 g the label claims. The one-time price is a mess: the product page displayed $69 on November 2, 2026 against a $96 anchor, while the store’s own one-pack variant data lists $90, and a separate $40.00 or $80.00 monthly line depending on the selected pack. At $69, the one-time cost is $2.30 per serving; at $90, it is $3.00. Either way, EcoWise costs 61% more than SWOLY on subscription and 109% to 173% more at its one-time prices.

Then the denominator changes. SuppCo’s June 2025 test found zero detectable creatine in two different lots. If that still describes the product, the cost per gram of verified creatine is undefined. The burden is on EcoWise to publish a passing COA, and it has not. Its “Subscribe & Save 50%” is measured against list prices subscribers never pay, and the page’s own numbers disagree; SWOLY’s simpler compare-at pricing is easier to predict.

Winner: SWOLY. It is cheaper per serving and per labeled gram, and it is the only one of the two where a cost-per-gram calculation has a real numerator.

Creatine Dose: Label vs. Verified

On paper, EcoWise has the better dose. Its label claims 5,000 mg of creatine monohydrate per four-gummy serving, with 120 gummies and 30 servings per pack. That matches the 5 g daily maintenance dose most creatine research uses, in one fewer gummy than SWOLY. If the label were accurate, EcoWise would win without much argument.

The label is not accurate, or at least it has not survived the only independent test anyone has published. In June 2025, SuppCo’s lab test bought 11 creatine products off the shelf — five powders and six gummies — and sent them to an ISO 17025-accredited lab. EcoWise’s monohydrate gummies returned zero detectable creatine. SuppCo then bought a different package from a different lot and tested again; the result was the same. The article was published on June 12, 2025, and it did not disclose lot numbers. Four of six gummies failed that round, but EcoWise’s result was the most extreme: not a low dose, not a mislabel, but no detectable active ingredient.

The lawsuit that followed made a similar allegation. In Fetters v. EcoWise Wellness LLC et al., No. 2:25-cv-09753 (C.D. Cal.), filed October 10, 2025, the plaintiff alleged that the gummies contained less than 0.05 mg of creatine per gummy — about 0.004% of the 5,000 mg label claim — based on SuppCo’s analysis and a second lab analysis paid for by the plaintiff’s lawyers. The case was dismissed by joint stipulation on January 27, 2026, with no public terms and no ruling on the facts. A dismissal is not an exoneration, and it is not a finding for the plaintiff either. It leaves the public record exactly where SuppCo’s test left it.

SWOLY’s dose is smaller but more believable. Five gummies deliver 4 g of micronized creatine monohydrate, in a 425 g container holding 30 servings. That is 1 g below the 5 g figure most often cited, but it sits inside the 3-5 g daily range that creatine research generally treats as adequate. Creatine saturates muscle over time, so 4 g daily will get most people to roughly the same place as 5 g. If you want a precise 5 g, you would need 6.25 SWOLY gummies, which adds 0.625 g of sugar and about a quarter of a serving’s cost. That is an inconvenience, not a scandal.

The evidence that SWOLY’s 4 g is real is not a published COA. It is a reported lab result. ActiveGearReview’s April 2025 review says SWOLY supplied third-party results showing 3,957 mg of creatine monohydrate per serving — close to the advertised 4,000 mg — but the lab was not named and the publication was not allowed to print the report. That is weaker than a downloadable COA and stronger than a label claim alone. No independent test of SWOLY has found zero creatine; no independent test of EcoWise has found any.

Winner: SWOLY. A verified-plausible 4 g beats an unverified 5 g, especially when the 5 g product returned zero detectable creatine in two lots.

Third-Party Testing and Independent Lab Evidence

“Third-party tested” is not a regulated term. A brand can say it without naming a lab, publishing a method, or showing a certificate. The useful version is a COA with a lot number, a lab name, an assay method and a result you can match to the package in your hand. Neither SWOLY nor EcoWise publishes that.

SWOLY claims its gummies are “rigorously tested by independent labs to ensure their accuracy, purity, and potency,” and its product page repeats “Third-Party Tested.” It does not name the lab, publish a COA, or provide a lot-level document. Garage Gym Reviews listed third-party testing as “No” in its specification table, concluding there was no mention of it on the website at the time of its review. BarBend rated third-party testing 3 out of 5 specifically because the lab is undisclosed. The one positive data point is the ActiveGearReview report: SWOLY shared a 3,957 mg result, the lab would not allow publication, and SWOLY said it was seeking another lab. That is a brand arranging a test and then being unable to show it — not nothing, but not verification.

EcoWise claims “3rd Party Tested For Purity & Potency” and its product page says “Request Any Document From Us.” No document is linked. The one independent test on record is SuppCo’s, and it failed. SuppCo’s product page, checked on November 2, 2026, still marks the product Failed Test for Identity & Potency, with a 6.44/10 TrustScore, and adds that “product-specific testing is not currently verified by SuppCo.” The page has not been updated with a retest, a new lot, or a certificate. EcoWise’s August 17, 2026 reply to a one-star Trustpilot review says its labeling is accurate and that independent lab testing confirms the labeled amount, but the reply includes no certificate and no lab name. A claim in a review response is not a COA.

The category context cuts both ways. Creatine gummies have a documented quality problem. In early 2024, NOW Foods tested 12 gummy brands and found half failed to meet label claims. In SuppCo’s 2025 round, four of six gummies failed. SWOLY is not proven clean by the category’s standards; it is simply not proven dirty. EcoWise is proven dirty by the only independent test that exists.

Winner: SWOLY. Not because its testing is good, but because it has no published failed assay, and the one result it reportedly shared is close to its label. EcoWise has a published failure and no public rebuttal document.

Taste and Format

Both products are gummies, and both solve the same problem: powder is a chore. There is no scoop, no shaker, no clumping, and no chalky aftertaste. If preparation is the reason you skip creatine, either format addresses it.

SWOLY’s version is five strawberry gummies per serving, 4 g of creatine, 2.5 g of sugar and a candy-like texture. The independent taste evidence is unusually strong for a supplement. BarBend scored taste 5 out of 5 and convenience 5 out of 5, and its reviewer described the format as genuinely easy to stick with. Garage Gym Reviews praised the taste in its Best Creatine for Teens (2026) roundup, where it rated the gummies 4.25 out of 5 overall. Shredded Dad’s review is similarly positive. The recurring criticism is not taste but texture consistency: a few reviewers note that some gummies are firmer than others.

EcoWise’s version is four gummies per serving, with strawberry and mango flavors, a pectin base and a label claim of 0 g of sugar. The format is fine on paper — fewer chews, two flavors, no gelatin — and the Trustpilot reviews that mention taste are positive. But there is no independent taste test of EcoWise’s gummies in the public record. The taste comments come from the brand’s own site or from a six-review Trustpilot profile, and the one-star review is about the missing creatine, not the flavor. You cannot compare a 5-out-of-5 independent taste score to brand-hosted praise and call it even.

Winner: SWOLY. It is the only one of the two with independently scored taste, and the scores are high.

Flavor Choice and Sugar on the Label

EcoWise wins this one, narrowly and with a caveat that matters.

EcoWise sells two flavors, strawberry and mango. SWOLY sells one, strawberry. EcoWise’s label states 0 g of total sugar per four-gummy serving and uses a pectin base; SWOLY’s states 2.5 g per five-gummy serving. On the narrow question of which product offers more choice and less sugar on paper, EcoWise is the answer.

The caveat is the word “paper.” The 0 g sugar claim is printed on the same supplement facts panel that claims 5,000 mg of creatine monohydrate per serving, and that panel is the one SuppCo’s lab found to be wrong about the active ingredient. A label that is wrong about creatine is not a label you should trust about sugar without independent verification. Label errors are not always uniform, so the sugar figure could be accurate even if the creatine figure was not. But you cannot verify one number on a failed label and ignore the other. Until EcoWise publishes a COA covering both identity/potency and the nutrition panel, treat the 0 g claim as unverified.

SWOLY’s 2.5 g of sugar is a real cost, especially if you top up to 5 g of creatine (about 3.1 g of sugar) or eat two servings. But it is a disclosed cost on a label that has not failed an independent test.

Winner: EcoWise Wellness, narrowly. Two flavors and 0 g of sugar on the label beat one flavor and 2.5 g, with the explicit caveat that the 0 g figure comes from a label that failed potency testing and has not been independently verified.

Refund and Subscription Terms

This is SWOLY’s clearest win, and it is the kind of win that matters more than a star rating.

SWOLY’s refund policy, read on November 2, 2026, gives you 30 days from purchase. It accepts used items. SWOLY covers return shipping, charges no restocking fee, and refunds the full amount including the original shipping cost. Refunds are processed after the returned item is received, generally within 14 business days. The FAQ tells a slightly different story — it says 30 days from receiving your order — but either version gives you a month to try the product and send it back. For a supplement you have to taste to evaluate, a used-item return is the policy that actually matters.

EcoWise’s written policy is much narrower. It gives you 30 days from delivery, but only for products that are unused, unopened, and in their original packaging with the label intact. You need a receipt and prior approval; items sent back without a request are refused. Return shipping is deducted from your refund. Opened products are excluded unless you can prove a valid issue such as a manufacturing defect or shipping damage. Refunds are issued within 10 business days after inspection. And if you cancel a subscription on the day it renews after the charge has gone through, that renewal is not refunded. The “30-day money-back guarantee” badge sits next to every add-to-cart button, but the written policy does not cover the one scenario a supplement buyer is most likely to be in: you opened the jar, tried it, and decided it is not for you.

The subscription terms follow the same pattern. SWOLY’s subscription is $27.95 per delivery; its FAQ does not document the cancellation process as of November 2, 2026, but a one-time order avoids it. EcoWise says “Modify or cancel any time,” but its written policy excludes a renewal charged on the cancellation date, so a cancelled subscription can still cost one more month.

The practical difference is simple. SWOLY lets you open the product, use it, and still ask for your money back within 30 days. EcoWise lets you look at an unopened jar for 30 days. If your reason for buying a gummy is that you are not sure the format will work for you, SWOLY’s policy is the one that lets you find out.

Winner: SWOLY. A 30-day window that accepts used items, covers return shipping and refunds the original shipping cost is a better consumer policy than a 30-day window that requires an unopened jar and deducts return postage.

Shipping Cost and Speed

Shipping is the one operational dimension where EcoWise has a real edge, at least for a US subscriber.

SWOLY charges shipping by weight and selected method. Its policy says to allow 1-2 business days for fulfillment and 3-5 days for delivery after shipping, with USPS, UPS and DHL. It says SWOLY ships “anywhere in the United States or internationally,” while the FAQ lists the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia. No free-shipping threshold is published. Expect a few dollars on top of the $32.98 or $27.95 at checkout.

EcoWise ships autoship orders free. Its policy says orders are processed in 1-2 business days; weekday standard orders placed before noon Eastern ship the same day, and expedited orders placed before 2 p.m. Eastern are guaranteed within 2 business days. Standard shipments go by USPS. The product page shows a $7.99 shipping value crossed out next to the free-shipping promise. For a US subscriber, that is a better deal than SWOLY’s paid shipping, and the 2-day expedited guarantee is firmer than SWOLY’s 3-5 day estimate.

The caveats are significant. EcoWise publishes no shipping rates for non-subscription orders, no standard delivery estimate, and no destination list. It is not clear from the site whether EcoWise ships outside the United States at all. SWOLY, by contrast, publishes international shipping and names its carriers. If you are in Canada, the UK, Australia or elsewhere, SWOLY is the only one of the two with a documented path to your address.

Winner: EcoWise Wellness, narrowly. Free autoship shipping and a guaranteed 2-day expedited tier beat paid-by-weight shipping, with the caveat that EcoWise publishes no rates, no standard delivery estimate and no destination list, and SWOLY is the only one of the two with documented international shipping.

Reputation and Complaint Record

Neither brand has a large, independent reputation record. The difference is what the small record contains.

SWOLY’s own site showed 4.85 out of 5 from 1,551 reviews on November 2, 2026. That is a big, favorable number, and it is brand-hosted and brand-curated, so it is marketing signal rather than an audit. The independent record is much thinner. On Trustpilot, SWOLY’s page showed zero published reviews and a 0.0 score on November 2, 2026, across every regional version checked. In July 2026 the same profile showed 3 reviews; our July check recorded a 4.0 score. Trustpilot’s transparency page reports zero reviews in the past 12 months, says the profile was claimed in March 2023, and does not explain the change. There is no Better Business Bureau profile for SWOLY LLC, so there is no BBB rating, complaint file or accreditation status to check. The independent expert record is favorable: Garage Gym Reviews scored the gummies 4.25 out of 5 in its Best Creatine for Teens (2026) roundup, BarBend scored taste 5/5 and formulation 4/5, and Shredded Dad’s review is positive. None of those outlets found a failed lab test.

EcoWise’s independent record is small and much worse. On Trustpilot, the EcoWise Vitamins profile showed 4.1 out of 5 from 6 reviews on November 2, 2026: 83% five-star, 17% one-star, with three reviews posted in August 2026. The single one-star review, from July 2025, says two independent tests found no creatine and asks for the company’s third-party results. EcoWise replied on August 17, 2026, disputing the allegation and saying the labeled amount is independently lab-confirmed, but the reply included no certificate. The BBB file is the counterweight: a D+ rating, not accredited, with one complaint in the last three years and none in the last twelve months. That complaint, dated August 27, 2025, is a product-issues complaint about an unauthorized charge and shipment, and it is marked unanswered. BBB’s stated rating reasons are “Failure to respond to 1 complaint(s) filed against business” and “Length of time business has been operating.”

EcoWise’s site claims “4.9 out of 5, 50k+ Reviews” against six Trustpilot reviews. That gap is not proof of fabrication, but it is a reason to treat the on-site number as advertising. SWOLY’s 1,551 on-site reviews are also brand-hosted; the gap between 1,551 and zero is at least explainable by a young brand, while the gap between 50,000 and 6 is not.

The asymmetry is the finding. SWOLY’s problem is an absence of independent evidence. EcoWise’s is independent evidence of a product that failed its core claim, plus an unanswered BBB complaint. An absence is easier to live with than a contradiction.

Winner: SWOLY. A thin independent record with no published failed assay, favorable expert reviews and no unanswered BBB complaint beat a six-review Trustpilot profile, a D+ BBB rating and a documented potency failure.

Company Transparency and Legal Record

Both companies are real, and both have paperwork problems. The difference is the kind of problem.

SWOLY is a US LLC selling through its own Shopify store, with published refund, shipping and FAQ pages. We found no lawsuit on record and no BBB complaint file as of November 2, 2026. Its issues are internal: the FAQ says the refund window runs 30 days from receipt while the policy says 30 days from purchase, the FAQ lists four shipping countries while the policy says international, and the FAQ does not document subscription cancellation. Those are the kinds of errors a small brand makes when it grows faster than its documentation — worth flagging, not evidence of fraud.

EcoWise’s paperwork is a different category. The site is run by Prosper Nutrition LLC per its terms, and the refund policy names EcoWise Wellness LLC with a return address in Garfield Heights, Ohio; the BBB profile lists a Houston, Texas address and the name “Prospser Nutrition” (sic). On November 2, 2026 the creatine page displayed a $45 subscription, a $69 one-time price against a $96 anchor, a $90 one-pack price in its own variant data, and a separate “$40.00 Every Month” line, while a two-pack view showed $110 one-time against a $160 anchor and $80 per month. Its FAQ still served placeholder text — “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit?” and “Welcome to my shop!” — on November 2, 2026. Its product page describes creatine as having a “GRAS rating,” which overstates the FDA’s 2020 no-questions letter on GRN 931, and its “third-party tested” claim has no linked certificate.

The legal record is the most serious part. Fetters v. EcoWise Wellness LLC et al., No. 2:25-cv-09753 (C.D. Cal.), was filed on October 10, 2025. The complaint alleged that the monohydrate gummies contained less than 0.05 mg of creatine per gummy, about 0.004% of the 5,000 mg label claim, based on SuppCo’s analysis and a second lab analysis paid for by the plaintiff. The defendants answered. The parties filed a joint stipulation to dismiss on January 27, 2026, and the public docket shows the case terminated that day. The terms were not made public, no class settlement was announced, and the court never ruled on the facts. A private dismissal is neither a finding that the product is fine nor a finding that it is not.

The science is not in dispute: the FDA’s 2020 no-questions letter on GRN 931 covers creatine monohydrate in food, and the ISSN position stand treats monohydrate as best-supported. Supplements are not FDA-approved before sale, and EcoWise’s separate HCl gummies deliver 900 mg per three-gummy serving, well below the 3-5 g daily dose.

Winner: SWOLY. Its paperwork contradicts itself in small ways; EcoWise’s contradicts itself on price, identity and the core product claim, and its 2025 lawsuit ended in a private dismissal rather than a public resolution.

Who Should Pick SWOLY

Pick SWOLY if you want a creatine gummy that plausibly contains creatine, at a lower cost per serving, with a refund policy that lets you try it.

Pick SWOLY if you already take creatine daily and want the format. The pitch is convenience, and the product delivers it: five strawberry gummies, no scoop, no shaker, no chalk. At $27.95 per 30-day subscription, the cost is about $0.93 per serving. If you have been skipping doses because powder is a chore, that is a real problem solved.

Pick SWOLY if you are comfortable with a 4 g dose. Four grams is below the 5 g figure most often cited, but it is inside the 3-5 g maintenance range. If you want a precise 5 g, eat 6.25 gummies or add a small amount of powder. If you want a simple daily habit and do not need an exact number, 4 g is fine.

Pick SWOLY if you want a low-risk trial. The 30-day refund policy accepts used items, covers return shipping, charges no restocking fee and refunds the original shipping cost. You can open the jar, try the gummies for a couple of weeks, and send them back if the format does not work for you.

Pick SWOLY if you are outside the US. Its shipping policy names USPS, UPS and DHL and says it ships internationally, while the FAQ lists the US, Canada, the UK and Australia. EcoWise publishes no destination list at all. If you are in Canada, the UK, Australia or another international market, SWOLY is the only one of the two with a documented path to your address.

You can order SWOLY directly from the brand. Do not pick it if you need a published COA, a precise 5 g dose, 0 g of sugar, two flavors, or a large independent review history. Do not pick it if you expect free shipping; it charges by weight. And do not pick it if you are unwilling to top up the dose or accept 2.5 g of sugar per serving. Those are real limitations.

Who Should Pick EcoWise Wellness

The honest version of this section is short: almost nobody buying creatine should pick EcoWise.

Pick EcoWise only if flavor variety and a 0 g sugar label matter more to you than verified creatine. It sells strawberry and mango; SWOLY sells strawberry only. Its label says 0 g of total sugar per serving; SWOLY’s says 2.5 g. If you have already decided to buy a creatine gummy regardless of the lab evidence and those two specs are your priority, EcoWise is the better spec sheet. The caveat is unavoidable: the 0 g sugar claim is on the same label that failed SuppCo’s potency test, and no COA has been published to separate the two.

Pick EcoWise if you are a US subscriber who values free shipping and a 2-day expedited guarantee. Autoship orders ship free, weekday orders placed before noon Eastern ship the same day, and expedited orders are guaranteed within two business days. SWOLY charges by weight and publishes a 3-5 day delivery window. On shipping mechanics alone, EcoWise is better for a US subscriber.

The brand also sells ashwagandha gummies and a Longevity Foundation stick. They are outside this comparison, but they carry the same documentation problem: no published COA and a brand-hosted review count that does not match its independent profile.

If you still want to try EcoWise Wellness, three practical steps. Buy a single one-time pack, not a subscription, so you are not managing a renewal. Keep it unopened until you have asked support in writing for the COA for your lot, because the written policy excludes opened products and you will need the jar sealed to have any refund path. Pay with a credit card so a chargeback exists if the order goes wrong. And do not buy it for the creatine. The one independent test found none.

Bottom Line

SWOLY wins this 7-2 as of November 2026. It takes price per serving and per verified gram, creatine dose, third-party testing evidence, taste and format, refund and subscription terms, reputation and complaint record, and company transparency and legal record. EcoWise takes flavor choice and sugar on the label, and shipping, both narrowly and both with caveats.

The central question was which gummy delivers creatine. SWOLY’s answer is a 4 g dose, below the research standard but plausible and independently reported at 3,957 mg per serving, backed by a brand with no published failed assay. EcoWise’s answer is a 5 g label claim that an ISO 17025 lab tested twice, in two different lots, and found zero detectable creatine both times. A 4 g gummy that contains creatine is worth more than a 5 g gummy that may contain none.

The cost and risk math agrees. SWOLY is $0.93 per serving on subscription and $1.10 one-time, with a 30-day refund policy that accepts used items. EcoWise is $1.50 to $3.00 per serving with a policy that requires an unopened jar. You pay more for the product that failed its potency test and offers the weaker exit.

EcoWise’s two wins are narrow. Two flavors and 0 g of sugar are advantages only if the label is accurate, and that label failed potency testing. Free autoship shipping is real for a US subscriber, though EcoWise publishes no rates or destination list. Neither changes the creatine answer.

One conclusion applies to both: neither publishes a COA. If a lot-level certificate is a hard requirement, neither gummy is the right purchase. A third-party-tested creatine powder is cheaper per gram, easier to verify and free of sugar.

Between the two, the choice is clear. For a creatine gummy that behaves like a creatine supplement, buy SWOLY on subscription and treat the 4 g dose as a reason to top up, not a dealbreaker. If you want flavor variety or free subscription shipping, EcoWise has those specs — but buy it for those reasons, not for the creatine.

---

Prices, servings, refund terms, shipping terms, Trustpilot scores, BBB records and product availability were checked on November 2, 2026. The SuppCo lab result comes from its June 12, 2025 article and its live product page, both read on November 2, 2026; SuppCo did not disclose lot numbers. The lawsuit status comes from the public docket, which shows a dismissal entry dated January 27, 2026. Neither brand publishes a certificate of analysis, and we found no published independent retest of either product between September and November 2026. This page is desk research: no product was purchased, no gummy was tasted and no lab work was commissioned. Reputation figures are aggregate summaries from Trustpilot, the Better Business Bureau and published expert reviews. Two things could not be settled: the exact one-time price EcoWise intends to charge, because its product page, variant data and fixed-monthly line disagree, and whether EcoWise ships outside the United States, because no destination list is published.